Tag: FedEx Cup

  • 5 Ways to End America’s Ryder Cup Futility

    5 Ways to End America’s Ryder Cup Futility

    At the outset the United States was utterly dominant in Ryder Cup play, losing only three times to Great Britain & Ireland in the first 50 years the biennial competition was held. But since GB & I was expanded to include the rest of Europe in 1979, the United States has an unenviable record of 8 wins and 12 defeats, including losses in 7 of the last 9 competitions.

    Obviously, the talent level of golf worldwide has grown significantly over the years, so it’s not unexpected to see the Europeans put up such a fight in recent years. What is unexpected, is for the US team to show up in Paris and lay a big, fat egg without looking all that surprised with the result. It’s almost as if they expected to lose. Were it not for a few spirited individual efforts on Sunday by the US squad, the 2018 edition of the Ryder Cup could have been a rout of historic proportions.

    Task Force Failure

    Following the 2014 loss at Gleneagles and Phil Mickelson’s infamous under-the-bus-throwing of Captain Tom Watson, the US formed some kind of task-force to examine the selection process and figure out a way to regain the edge. Despite a solid win in 2016 at Hazeltine, the United States Ryder Cup team as a whole is still more of a gathering of pampered millionaires than a cohesive team of golfers. I believe the task force is fundamentally flawed, but more on that later.

    Team USA’s flaws were on display to anyone that was paying attention at Le Golf Nationale in Paris, France last month. For starters, I saw 2 or 3 players from the US team that seemed disinterested in even being there. From the way he played all week and his general demeanor, it looked to me like Bubba Watson couldn’t get the hell out of Paris fast enough. World No 1 Dustin Johnson is usually pretty stoic on the course, but he seemed particularly apathetic once his putting stroke failed him, and he managed to win only 1 point all week. Jim Furyk’s three captain’s picks went a combined 0-9. In Captain Furyk’s defense, it was nearly impossible for him NOT to pick Tiger Woods and Bryson DeChambeau for the team. DeChambeau won the first 2 FedEx Cup Playoff events and Tiger Woods finished a remarkable comeback season and easily justified his pick by winning the season-ending Tour Championship.

    Phil Mickelson was playing pretty bad golf, yet he was picked for the team anyway, probably because he’s Phil Mickelson. Captain Furyk said he is great in the team room and has a lot of experience. Sure – losing experience. And the last time I checked, matches aren’t played in the team room. Sarcasm aside, you can’t win a Ryder Cup if your “leaders” and captain’s picks can’t earn a single point all week.

    In the aftermath, we heard stories of players complaining about who they were paired with, players complaining about their position in the Sunday singles matches, and even about players fighting. I’m referring of course to Patrick Reed’s comments about his successful past partnership with Jordan Speith being broken up, and to the reported scuffle between Brooks Koepka and Dustin Johnson, which they both claim never happened. I’m not putting too much stock in these stories, but the overall vibe is one of dysfunction and lack of cohesion. If just one player in the team room has a negative attitude because he’s not happy about who he’s paired with, or has issues with another player, that team cannot be successful.

    If you don’t learn from your failures, you are doomed to repeat them. Having said that, I don’t think it is beyond saving. The USA still has dozens and dozens of players that are more than capable of winning on the Ryder Cup stage, and the future looks bright for a whole new generation of young golfers. Here are 5 ideas that I think could help recreate the winning formula for the United States going forward:

    Get players that want to be there – The PGA Tour season is long and it can be a grind. All jokes about 5-star hotels and private jets aside, it’s not easy to make a living playing golf. Most players on the PGA Tour don’t fly in private jets and drive Lamborghinis. But most US players aren’t used to playing in a team environment, and the demands of professional golf in the United States encourages more of a me-against-the-world mentality. Perhaps losing is partially responsible for the perceived decline in interest for the Ryder Cup in America lately. Either way, if a player doesn’t really want to be there and can’t commit 100 percent of their mental energy to represent their country for a week, they shouldn’t be on the team. This is why I think we need to change the process by which we pick the team.

    Change the team selection process – The Ryder Cup selection process has been tweaked a bit over the years and the captain has another wildcard pick at his disposal, but I believe the captain should have more control over the makeup of the team. Why not let the captain pick half the players or more? The team should be made up of players that are playing well now and can be expected to play well at the host venue. The current points ranking system doesn’t work. Why should your team’s roster be determined by someone who played great 6 months ago and earned enough points to hold on and make the team now? That’s stupid.

    The good ‘ol boy network needs to be scrapped and the USA should get a captain that is committed to winning, not just making everyone happy and letting them play with their buddies. Yes, that’s a dig at Jim Furyk who broke up several proven winning pairings like Reed/Speith so that Jordan could play with his childhood buddy Justin Thomas, and who’s pick of a flailing Phil Mickelson was not conducive to winning, given that Phil only played two matches anyway and didn’t earn a single point. Why pick a player to have him ride the bench all week?

    We’ve seen several non-golf superstars hanging around the US Ryder Cup squad in recent years, like Michael Jordan, Condoleezza Rice, and John McEnroe. That got me thinking – Why does the captain have to be a golfer? Why not pick a knowledgeable sports figure or proven national leader to manage the team? Someone that will make decisions with the best interests of the team in mind, not egos. I think we should go with a respected leader that these players are willing to follow, and it doesn’t have to be a professional golfer. Think outside the box!

    Pick a venue that gives us the advantage – There was a lot of talk about Le Golf Nationale in Paris as the venue for the 2018 Ryder Cup. It was set up almost like a US Open, with narrow fairways and thick rough. It’s no secret that the European squad did this to penalize the long-hitting US players. Our “bombers” are also some of the least accurate drivers of the golf ball on tour, and the Europeans took advantage of this to set up the course in their favor. This goes back to my first point – Instead of having most of the US Team automatically qualified on points, our captain needs to have the flexibility to pick players whose game is better suited for the venue. I think the results could have been very different if Captain Furyk had consistent ball strikers like Matt Kuchar, Kevin Kisner, Zach Johnson or Xander Schauffele on the team instead of Phil, Tiger, and Bubba. And on that note…

    Retire the old guard – I’m not the only one who has suggested it and many people don’t dare speak of it, but I’ll say it anyway – It’s time to put Phil Mickelson and Tiger Woods out to pasture in Ryder Cup competition. In 12 Ryder Cup appearances, Phil Mickelson has only won more than 2.5 points twice. In 47 matches played, he has only 18 wins. Tiger’s overall record isn’t much better at 13-21-3. While these guys are two of the best golfers in history and founding members of the so-called Ryder Cup Taskforce, they are also part of the problem and proven liabilities in this team format and need to be retired as Ryder Cuppers. Bring them on for a few more President’s Cups (We can still win that easily even with both of them in the lineup), or as vice-captains if you want their leadership and presence in the team room.

    Scheduling & preparation – Only one player from the United States Ryder Cup Team had ever played Le Golf Nationale in tournament conditions – Justin Thomas. Is it a coincidence that he went 4-1 on the week and was the best player on the team? I don’t think so. The US team had two years to prepare and play the golf course, and they only had one guy with prior tournament experience there? That’s not only bad preparation, but it fed right into the European team’s strategy and setup. Because of the flawed team selection process, Jim Furyk’s hands were tied. He couldn’t field a team that would be able to drive it in the fairway and neutralize the European advantage. Instead, the United States brought a bunch of guys who can’t hit fairways to a course that puts a premium on hitting fairways. Not the best game plan.

    To make matters worse, several US players looked quite weary after playing 4 out of 5 weeks chasing the FedEx Cup. Tiger Woods, in particular, looked mentally and physically drained after his breakthrough win at the Tour Championship just days earlier. Bryson DeChambeau appears to have peaked a bit early, winning the first two events of the FedEx Cup playoffs, but perhaps the season-long grind also got to him in Paris because he looked out of sorts all week. For some reason, the European players didn’t seem as affected by the season-ending playoff grind. I’ll chalk it up to the home course fans lifting their boys emotionally.

    In terms of quality of play, I think it would be best for the Ryder Cup as a whole if the event was held at a time of the year where you can give the players at least a week off before the matches. It obviously would have helped the USA this year. The event only takes place every two years – would it be that difficult to give them a week off to rest up and get ready?

    Will it Work?

    Even if the United States implemented all these changes there’s no guarantee of success, but I think the odds would be much better. The US needs to field a team of players that are fresh, genuinely want to be there, want to play together and whose skills are well suited for the course. Team Europe has taken advantage of our flawed process to tilt the playing field in their favor. They relish the fact that their guys play better in pairs than us, and they consistently field a group of players that accept their role and form a cohesive unit towards a single purpose. It’s time for the USA to revamp their preparation, roster, and attitude towards the competition if they want to remain competitive in the Ryder Cup for years to come.

  • Tiger Woods Poised to win FedEx Cup

    sept26_woods_600x399All Tiger Woods has to do to win the FedEx Cup tomorrow is finish in the top two. I think. Oh hell, I dunno. Has anyone figured out the FedEx Cup points fiasco? Either way, we’ve come to expect Tiger to do what needs to be done to win. It also helps that people seem to forget how to play when he’s on the first page of the leaderboard on Sunday. Kenny Perry has a two shot lead going into the final round, and just won the Payne Stewart award, which he called the greatest accomplishment of his career. With a good round Sunday and a small collapse from Tiger, he could also with the FedEx cup. Steve Stricker had a good day and is also back in it, along with Padraig Harrington and Phil Mickelson. It’s nice to see Phil in contention again. The last time we saw him at the top of a leaderboard was at the US Open. I miss his aggressive play and eventual blow up. Watching Phil play is like watching restrictor plate racing in NASCAR, we watch because we know the big wreck is coming sooner or later.

    For all the hooplah and manufactured hype about the FedEx cup, the PGA Tour seems to be getting what they wanted. Many of the big names are in contention and the biggest name is ready to claim the FedEx cup. With the change in the way the points system works, we were guaranteed that the winner wouldn’t be decided until this weekend in Atlanta. However, the winner of the FedEx cup may not be the winner of the Tour Championship, which I still don’t understand. Are you going to have two guys for the trophy presentation? Won’t that suck for the winner if someone else wins the FedEx Cup?  “Congratulations Mr X, here’s your little trophy and $1.35 Million, now move over. Congrats Mr. Y, here’s a way bigger trophy and way bigger check!”

    The television commentators try to put up projections of where players might finish as they play, but I think this is just a weak attempt to create drama. Nobody really seems to know what’s going on, and not as many players really have a chance to win the cup as we think. At this point, O’Hair, Perry, Stricker and Harrington all have a mathematical chance to win, but it all depends on what Tiger does. Tiger needs to finish third or worst for any of the aformentioned players to even have a chance, and they would have to win.

    Last year the FedEx cup was a forgone conclusion, with Vijay just having to finish the tournament to win the cup. At least this years rule changes have made it a little bit more dramatic. But the drama is really only with the players, as they are the ones competing for $11 Million. For the fans, it’s more about who wins the tour championship, especially with Tiger on the field. If you ask the fans, they would probably tell you that it would be better to reset the points to zero and make the Tour Championship a shootout, with the winner taking the whole damn thing. I think you could even take the low 16 guys after 54 holes and make a cut, then reset the scores again and have an 18 hole, 16 player shootout for the FedEx Cup. You want drama? I’ll give you drama! 16 guys, all with an equal chance to win, and everyone will be glued to that television set! Maybe they’ll change the rules again next year too.

    <

    p style=”text-align: center;”>

  • Does Anybody Care About The FedEx Cup?

    Who will win the FedEx Cup?
    Who will win the FedEx Cup?

    The FedEx Cup was created in November of 2005 to add some excitement to the end of the PGA Tour golf season. Every professional sport seems to build towards a year end climax, giving the fans something to look forward to all season. On the PGA Tour we have the majors to fill that need. Unfortunately, after the PGA Championship the interest level of the fans and many players falls of significantly, and the television ratings reflect that.

    In the past, many of the top players would take breaks from the schedule as the holidays drew nearer, and many tournaments on the tail end of the PGA Tour schedule suffered from low ratings and a lack of star power. Tiger Woods’ emergence on the tour in the late 90s helped drive tournament purses to all time highs, and also made it more expensive to host a tournament. When he doesn’t play, the ratings and fan attendance fall off significantly. As a result, the sponsors don’t get their money’s worth and some were threatening to pull out. The PGA Tour needed a boost at the end of the season.

    Most of the other professional sports have a regular season that leads up to the playoffs, where an eventual champion is crowned for the year. The marketing minds in Ponte Vedra Beach thought this system would work too, and they dreamed up the FedEx Cup Playoffs.

    460x60 Lower Prices On NIKE SQ SUMO 5000 Drivers

    Starting in 2007, the FedEx Cup became a season ending points race similar to the one used in NASCAR. The top points earner becomes the FedEx Cup champion. In a sleeper, Tiger Woods won the first FedEx Cup by 12,000 points. Over the last two years the PGA Tour has changed the rules to address issues that arose the previous year. In 2008, the changes were designed to allow more golfers a chance to move up the points list as the playoffs go along, and penalize those who skip a playoff event. When Vijay Singh earned enough points in the first three events early in the 2008 campaign, he just had to show up the final week to claim the FedEx Cup. In November of 2008 they changed the rules once again to help ensure that the championship would not be won until the final event.

    This year at the season ending Tour Championship only the top 30 players will be eligible to play, with the points resetting so that any player in the field has a chance to win the cup. Any player in the top 30 can win, but the higher ranking players have the greatest chance. The first ranked player starts the Tour Championship with 2500 points, and the 30th ranked player starts the week with 210. Obviously this is to virtually ensure that the top 10 players have the greatest chance to win, since the tour is betting that the top players include most of the star personalities like Tiger, Phil, Ernie, Goosen, Furyk, etc.

    So the real question is – does anyone really care about the FedEx Cup? We’ve already mentioned that the television ratings go way up when Tiger is in the field, and the ratings go through the roof when Tiger is on the leader board with other names like Mickelson and Els in contention. If TV viewership is the sole indicator then the FedEx Cup Playoffs are a success. If you ask the players you might get different stories. The whole set up of the playoffs and the points structure are designed to keep the big names on your TV set all the way up to the silly season, which makes the sponsors happy and the tour rich. In fact, the Champions Tour and European tours have adopted similar playoff type systems called the Charles Schwab Cup and the Race to Dubai.

    Respect for a golf tournament is usually measured by who shows up to play it, and to a lesser extent by the prize money available. Many golfers would tell you that they would play a major championship like the Masters or US Open even if no prize money were offered, because they want to win a prestigious tournament that many of the games great have won in the past and winning these tournaments makes you a part of history. The FedEx Cup doesn’t have the history or the prestige of a major, but it has the prize money. I suspect we won’t be hearing too many young phenoms saying “I want to win the FedEx Cup.” when asked what they want to accomplish as a professional golfer.

    I don’t think the players really care about winning the FedEx Cup as much as they want to win the huge $10 million payout and five year exemption. I think this weakens the whole event into a frantic money grab. People just want to see their favorite players, they don’t care so much about the Cup. Besides, despite the rule changes the winner of the Tour Championship may not necessarily be the winner of the FedEx Cup, so who wants to see someone win the Cup without winning the last event? That would be like the Lakers winning the NBA Finals even if the Magic won the series because they won more games in the playoffs than Orlando. Reset everyone’s points to zero for the Tour Championship and make it a real shootout! Unfortunately I don’t think that will happen, because Tim Finchem wants to hand the Cup to Tiger or Phil, not to Heath Slocum or Ted Purdy.

    Let me know what you think. Should the FedEx Cup matter or is it a marketing gimmick? Will the FedEx Cup become a premier event that people really want to win? What do you think?

    468x60 Nike Final Clearance